Model Comparison
GPT-5 (high)
vs. Llama 4 Scout
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · OpenAI, Meta
Recommended Pick
OpGPT-5 (high)18 metric winsStrongest on: TTFT, Latency, Reasoning
Best Value
Llama 4 Scout
100.0 value score
30.5 reasoning / $0.30/1M
Lowest Price
Llama 4 Scout
$0.18/1M input price
Best Reasoning
GPT-5 (high)
75.8 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
GPT-5 (high)
37.8 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Llama 4 Scout has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Llama 4 Scout is 6.9x cheaper on input tokens than GPT-5 (high).
Reasoning gap
GPT-5 (high) leads Llama 4 Scout by 45.2 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
GPT-5 (high) leads Llama 4 Scout by 29.6 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
GPT-5 (high) wins 18 measurable categories, including TTFT, Latency, Reasoning, Intelligence.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
GPT-5 (high)
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Op GPT-5 (high) | Me Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $1.25/1M | $0.18/1M |
| Output Cost | $10.00/1M | $0.66/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.44/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | OpenAI | Meta |
| Release Date | Aug 7, 2025 | Apr 5, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 97.7 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 565ms |
| Latency | — | 565ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 21.7 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 75.8 | 30.5 |
| Intelligence | 34.7 | 10.0 |
| Coding | 37.8 | 8.2 |
| Math | 94.3 | 14.0 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 85.4% | 58.7% |
| MMLU Pro | 87.1% | 75.2% |
| HLE | 26.5% | 4.3% |
| LiveCodeBench | 84.6% | 29.9% |
| MATH 500 | 99.4% | 84.4% |
| AIME 2025 | 94.3% | 14.0% |
| AIME (Original) | 95.7% | 28.3% |
| SciCode | 42.9% | 17.0% |
| LCR | 75.6% | 25.8% |
| IFBench | 73.1% | 39.5% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 84.8% | 15.5% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 32.6% | 1.5% |
Key Takeaways
Llama 4 Scout offers the best value at $0.18/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
GPT-5 (high) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 75.8 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
GPT-5 (high) reaches a 37.8 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
GPT-5 (high)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Llama 4 Scout
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
