Model Comparison

K3 (max)
vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash (high)

Comparing 2 AI models · 4 benchmarks · Kimi, Google

Recommended Pick

Google logoGemini 3.7 Flash (high)8 metric wins

Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price

Best Value

Google logo

Gemini 3.7 Flash (high)

100.0 value score

66.1 reasoning / $1.50/1M

Lowest Price

Google logo

Gemini 3.7 Flash (high)

$0.75/1M input price

Best Reasoning

Kimi logo

K3 (max)

66.7 reasoning score

Blends available reasoning benchmarks

Best for Coding

Kimi logo

K3 (max)

76.2 coding index

Composite Indices

Higher is better; speed and price are normalized

Standard Benchmarks

Only benchmarks with data are shown

Differences That Matter

Best value

Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.

Price gap

Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) is 4.0x cheaper on input tokens than K3 (max).

Speed gap

Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) generates about 14x as many tokens per second as K3 (max).

Reasoning gap

K3 (max) leads Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) by 0.6 points on reasoning.

Coding gap

K3 (max) leads Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) by 0.1 points on coding.

Live compare

Response Face-Off

Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.

Kimi logo

K3 (max)

Kimi

Waiting

TTFT

Time

tok/s

Tokens

Cost

Waiting
Google logo

Gemini 3.7 Flash (high)

Google

Waiting

TTFT

Time

tok/s

Tokens

Cost

Waiting

Which answer was more useful?

Chat with leading AI models

Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.

EU-hosted inference

Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.

Full Comparison

Metric
Kimi logoK3 (max)
Kimi
Top Pick
Google logoGemini 3.7 Flash (high)
Google
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input Cost$3.00/1M$0.75/1M
Output Cost$15.00/1M$3.75/1M
Blended (3:1)$6.00/1M$1.50/1M
Specifications
OrganizationKimiGoogle
Release DateJul 16, 2026Aug 13, 2026
Performance & Speed
Throughput36.8 tok/s515.0 tok/s
TTFT2862ms6354ms
Latency57251ms6354ms
Composite Indices
Value Score25.2100.0
Reasoning Score66.766.1
Intelligence59.756.0
Coding76.276.1
Standard Benchmarks
GPQA93.5%94.5%
HLE46.9%47.9%
SciCode58.7%56.8%
LCR82.7%80.0%

Key Takeaways

Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) offers the best value at $0.75/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.

K3 (max) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 66.7 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.

K3 (max) reaches a 76.2 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.

All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.

When to Choose Each Model

Kimi logo

K3 (max)

  • Complex reasoning tasks
  • Research & analysis
  • Code generation
  • Software development
Google logo

Gemini 3.7 Flash (high)

  • Cost-sensitive applications
  • High-volume processing