Model Comparison
K3 (max)
vs. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Comparing 2 AI models · 4 benchmarks · Kimi, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3.8 2.4T A95B7 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
100.0 value score
64.5 reasoning / $3.00/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
$2.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
K3 (max)
66.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
K3 (max)
76.2 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 1.5x cheaper on input tokens than K3 (max).
Speed gap
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B generates about 1.4x as many tokens per second as K3 (max).
Reasoning gap
K3 (max) leads Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B by 2.2 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
K3 (max) leads Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B by 4.3 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
K3 (max)
Kimi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Ki K3 (max) | Top Pick Al Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $3.00/1M | $2.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $15.00/1M | $6.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $6.00/1M | $3.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Kimi | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Jul 16, 2026 | Aug 12, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 37.1 tok/s | 52.4 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2753ms | 1830ms |
| Latency | 56731ms | 40029ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 51.7 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 66.7 | 64.5 |
| Intelligence | 59.7 | 57.7 |
| Coding | 76.2 | 71.9 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 93.5% | 93.5% |
| HLE | 46.9% | 42.4% |
| SciCode | 58.7% | 51.6% |
| LCR | 82.7% | 75.3% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B offers the best value at $2.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
K3 (max) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 66.7 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
K3 (max) reaches a 76.2 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
K3 (max)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
