Model Comparison
MiMo-V2.5
vs. MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Xiaomi
Recommended Pick
Xi MiMo-V2.5 15 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
MiMo-V2.5
100.0 value score
53.0 reasoning / $0.18/1M
Lowest Price
MiMo-V2.5
$0.14/1M input price
Best Reasoning
MiMo-V2.5
53.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
MiMo-V2.5
42.1 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
MiMo-V2.5 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
MiMo-V2.5 is 6.4x cheaper on input tokens than MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning).
Speed gap
MiMo-V2.5 generates about 1.6x as many tokens per second as MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
MiMo-V2.5 leads MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) by 11.3 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
MiMo-V2.5 leads MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) by 5.3 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Xi MiMo-V2.5 | Xi MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.14/1M | $0.90/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.28/1M | $2.70/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.18/1M | $1.35/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Release Date | Apr 22, 2026 | Apr 22, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 81.8 tok/s | 51.9 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2493ms | 2367ms |
| Latency | 26940ms | 2367ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 10.2 |
| Reasoning Score | 53.0 | 41.7 |
| Intelligence | 49.0 | 35.6 |
| Coding | 42.1 | 36.8 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 84.9% | 76.2% |
| HLE | 25.2% | 13.3% |
| SciCode | 43.1% | 39.1% |
| LCR | 62.7% | 35.0% |
| IFBench | 67.1% | 42.7% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 90.6% | 72.5% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 41.7% | 35.6% |
Key Takeaways
MiMo-V2.5 offers the best value at $0.14/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
MiMo-V2.5 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 53.0 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
MiMo-V2.5 reaches a 42.1 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
MiMo-V2.5
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
