Model Comparison
MiMo-V2.5
vs. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Xiaomi, NVIDIA
Recommended Pick
Xi MiMo-V2.5 8 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
MiMo-V2.5
100.0 value score
50.1 reasoning / $0.18/1M
Lowest Price
MiMo-V2.5
$0.14/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)
50.4 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)
49.3 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
MiMo-V2.5 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
MiMo-V2.5 is 4.8x cheaper on input tokens than Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning).
Speed gap
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) generates about 2.3x as many tokens per second as MiMo-V2.5.
Reasoning gap
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) leads MiMo-V2.5 by 0.3 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
MiMo-V2.5 wins 8 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)
NVIDIA
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Xi MiMo-V2.5 | NV Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.14/1M | $0.68/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.28/1M | $2.67/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.18/1M | $1.18/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Xiaomi | NVIDIA |
| Release Date | Apr 22, 2026 | Jun 4, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 78.6 tok/s | 180.3 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2027ms | 829ms |
| Latency | 27483ms | 13445ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 15.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 50.1 | 50.4 |
| Intelligence | 40.1 | 37.8 |
| Coding | — | 49.3 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 84.9% | 86.7% |
| HLE | 25.2% | 26.6% |
| SciCode | 43.1% | 39.9% |
| LCR | 62.7% | 67.0% |
| IFBench | 67.1% | 81.4% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 90.6% | 83.3% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 41.7% | 36.4% |
Key Takeaways
MiMo-V2.5 offers the best value at $0.14/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 50.4 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) reaches a 49.3 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
MiMo-V2.5
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
