Model Comparison
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
vs. Qwen3 Coder Next
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Xiaomi, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Xi MiMo-V2.5-Pro 13 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Output price, Blended price
Best Value
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
100.0 value score
58.1 reasoning / $0.54/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3 Coder Next
$0.35/1M input price
Best Reasoning
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
58.1 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
45.5 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3 Coder Next is 1.2x cheaper on input tokens than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
Speed gap
Qwen3 Coder Next generates about 2.3x as many tokens per second as MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
Reasoning gap
MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads Qwen3 Coder Next by 21.0 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads Qwen3 Coder Next by 22.6 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3 Coder Next
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Xi MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Al Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.43/1M | $0.35/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.87/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.54/1M | $0.56/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Xiaomi | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Apr 22, 2026 | Feb 3, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 39.5 tok/s | 89.0 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2051ms | 1300ms |
| Latency | 52642ms | 1300ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 61.8 |
| Reasoning Score | 58.1 | 37.1 |
| Intelligence | 53.8 | 28.3 |
| Coding | 45.5 | 22.9 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 86.6% | 73.7% |
| HLE | 33.8% | 9.3% |
| SciCode | 50.2% | 32.3% |
| LCR | 73.3% | 40.0% |
| IFBench | 79.9% | 35.2% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 94.2% | 79.5% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 43.2% | 18.2% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3 Coder Next offers the best value at $0.35/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the strongest reasoning profile with a 58.1 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro reaches a 45.5 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Qwen3 Coder Next
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
