Model Comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning)
vs. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Xiaomi, Google
Recommended Pick
Go Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 9 metric wins Strongest on: Intelligence, Coding, GPQA
Best Value
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning)
100.0 value score
67.5 reasoning / $0.15/1M
Lowest Price
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning)
$0.10/1M input price
Best Reasoning
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning)
67.5 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
55.5 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) is 20x cheaper on input tokens than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
Speed gap
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) generates about 1.2x as many tokens per second as Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
Reasoning gap
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) leads Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by 2.2 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) by 23.7 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning)
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Xi MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) | Top Pick Go Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.10/1M | $2.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.30/1M | $12.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.15/1M | $4.50/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Xiaomi | |
| Release Date | Dec 16, 2025 | Feb 19, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 152.1 tok/s | 129.7 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1352ms | 19620ms |
| Latency | 14501ms | 19620ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 3.2 |
| Reasoning Score | 67.5 | 65.3 |
| Intelligence | 39.2 | 57.2 |
| Coding | 31.8 | 55.5 |
| Math | 96.3 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 84.6% | 94.1% |
| MMLU Pro | 84.3% | — |
| HLE | 21.1% | 44.7% |
| LiveCodeBench | 86.8% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 96.3% | — |
| SciCode | 39.4% | 58.9% |
| LCR | 63.0% | 72.7% |
| IFBench | 64.2% | 77.1% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 95.0% | 95.6% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 28.0% | 53.8% |
Key Takeaways
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.10/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 67.5 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview reaches a 55.5 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Code generation
- Software development
