Model Comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning)
vs. GPT-5.5 (xhigh)
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Xiaomi, OpenAI
Recommended Pick
Xi MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) 9 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning)
100.0 value score
67.5 reasoning / $0.15/1M
Lowest Price
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning)
$0.10/1M input price
Best Reasoning
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning)
67.5 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
GPT-5.5 (xhigh)
59.1 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) is 50x cheaper on input tokens than GPT-5.5 (xhigh).
Speed gap
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) generates about 2.8x as many tokens per second as GPT-5.5 (xhigh).
Reasoning gap
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) leads GPT-5.5 (xhigh) by 1.5 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
GPT-5.5 (xhigh) leads MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) by 27.3 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning)
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
GPT-5.5 (xhigh)
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Xi MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) | Op GPT-5.5 (xhigh) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.10/1M | $5.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.30/1M | $30.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.15/1M | $11.25/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Xiaomi | OpenAI |
| Release Date | Dec 16, 2025 | Apr 23, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 152.1 tok/s | 54.2 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1352ms | 40274ms |
| Latency | 14501ms | 40274ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 1.3 |
| Reasoning Score | 67.5 | 66.0 |
| Intelligence | 39.2 | 60.2 |
| Coding | 31.8 | 59.1 |
| Math | 96.3 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 84.6% | 93.5% |
| MMLU Pro | 84.3% | — |
| HLE | 21.1% | 44.3% |
| LiveCodeBench | 86.8% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 96.3% | — |
| SciCode | 39.4% | 56.1% |
| LCR | 63.0% | 74.3% |
| IFBench | 64.2% | 75.9% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 95.0% | 93.9% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 28.0% | 60.6% |
Key Takeaways
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.10/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 67.5 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
GPT-5.5 (xhigh) reaches a 59.1 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
GPT-5.5 (xhigh)
- Code generation
- Software development
