Model Comparison
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B
vs. Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · OpenBMB, Anthropic
Recommended Pick
AnClaude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)2 metric winsStrongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
$4.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
57.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B
0.7 coding index
Differences That Matter
Reasoning gap
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) leads MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B by 51.9 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) wins 2 measurable categories, including Reasoning, Intelligence.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B
OpenBMB
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
Anthropic
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted open models, one API
Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Op MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B | Top Pick An Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | — | $4.00/1M |
| Output Cost | — | $20.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $8.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | OpenBMB | Anthropic |
| Release Date | May 11, 2026 | Sep 22, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 95.6 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 748610ms |
| Latency | — | 748610ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 5.7 | 57.6 |
| Intelligence | 5.7 | 57.6 |
| Coding | 0.7 | — |
Key Takeaways
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) offers the best value at $4.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 57.6 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B reaches a 0.7 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
MiniCPM-V 4.6 1.3B
- Code generation
- Software development
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
