Model Comparison
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)
vs. Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · NVIDIA, Anthropic
Recommended Pick
NVNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)6 metric winsStrongest on: Input price, Output price, Blended price
Lowest Price
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)
$0.05/1M input price
Best for Coding
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)
14.4 coding index
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) is 80x cheaper on input tokens than Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback).
Speed gap
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) generates about 3.2x as many tokens per second as Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback).
Top-pick rationale
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) wins 6 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, Blended price, Throughput.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)
NVIDIA
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)
Anthropic
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Use open-weight models like DeepSeek, Qwen and Kimi in one app.
EU-hosted open models, one API
Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick NV Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) | An Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.05/1M | $4.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.20/1M | $20.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.09/1M | $8.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | NVIDIA | Anthropic |
| Release Date | Dec 15, 2025 | Sep 22, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 269.6 tok/s | 83.8 tok/s |
| TTFT | 910ms | 123980ms |
| Latency | 8330ms | 123980ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | — | 57.0 |
| Intelligence | — | 57.0 |
| Coding | 14.4 | — |
Key Takeaways
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.05/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) reaches a 14.4 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
