Model Comparison
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)
vs. Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Al Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) 11 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)
44.9 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)
33.4 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) leads Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) by 21.1 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) leads Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) by 26.7 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) wins 11 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) | Al Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.30/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $2.60/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.88/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Feb 24, 2026 | Oct 14, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 92.2 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 1412ms | — |
| Latency | 1412ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 44.9 | 23.8 |
| Intelligence | 37.2 | 13.7 |
| Coding | 33.4 | 6.7 |
| Math | — | 25.7 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 84.2% | 49.4% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 70.0% |
| HLE | 13.2% | 4.4% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 32.0% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 25.7% |
| SciCode | 36.7% | 17.1% |
| LCR | 55.7% | 21.3% |
| IFBench | 46.9% | 36.6% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 87.1% | 15.5% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 31.8% | 1.5% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 44.9 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning) reaches a 33.4 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.5 27B (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
