Model Comparison
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
vs. 105B (high)
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Alibaba, Sarvam
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)12 metric winsStrongest on: Throughput, TTFT, Latency
Best Value
105B (high)
100.0 value score
31.9 reasoning / $0.07/1M
Lowest Price
105B (high)
$0.04/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
39.4 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
105B (high) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
105B (high) is 6.0x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning).
Speed gap
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) generates about 1.7x as many tokens per second as 105B (high).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) leads 105B (high) by 7.4 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) wins 12 measurable categories, including Throughput, TTFT, Latency, Reasoning.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
105B (high)
Sarvam
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) | Sa 105B (high) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.25/1M | $0.04/1M |
| Output Cost | $2.00/1M | $0.17/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.69/1M | $0.07/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Sarvam |
| Release Date | Feb 24, 2026 | Mar 6, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 191.5 tok/s | 113.9 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1157ms | 1170ms |
| Latency | 1157ms | 18732ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 13.3 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 39.4 | 31.9 |
| Intelligence | 23.4 | 11.9 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 81.9% | 73.8% |
| HLE | 12.8% | 10.1% |
| SciCode | 29.3% | 26.4% |
| LCR | 55.3% | 0.0% |
| IFBench | 44.5% | 34.4% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 86.3% | 46.8% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 10.6% | 1.5% |
Key Takeaways
105B (high) offers the best value at $0.04/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 39.4 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
105B (high)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
