Model Comparison
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
vs. Solar Pro 4
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Upstage
Recommended Pick
UpSolar Pro 49 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Solar Pro 4
100.0 value score
41.6 reasoning / $0.52/1M
Lowest Price
Solar Pro 4
$0.30/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Solar Pro 4
41.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
53.7 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Solar Pro 4 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Solar Pro 4 is 2.0x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning).
Speed gap
Solar Pro 4 generates about 1.5x as many tokens per second as Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Solar Pro 4 leads Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) by 3.9 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) leads Solar Pro 4 by 1.0 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Solar Pro 4
Upstage
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Processing terms vary by selected model. Review the current Privacy Policy and DPA before using sensitive data.
OpenAI-compatible inference
Choose from the current model catalog. Processing terms vary by selected model and service.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) | Top Pick Up Solar Pro 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.60/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Output Cost | $3.60/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.35/1M | $0.52/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Upstage |
| Release Date | Apr 22, 2026 | Aug 6, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 52.5 tok/s | 78.2 tok/s |
| TTFT | 3640ms | 1950ms |
| Latency | 111650ms | 27540ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 35.2 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 37.7 | 41.6 |
| Intelligence | 37.7 | 41.6 |
| Coding | 53.7 | 52.7 |
Key Takeaways
Solar Pro 4 offers the best value at $0.30/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Solar Pro 4 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 41.6 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning) reaches a 53.7 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.6 27B (Reasoning)
- Code generation
- Software development
Solar Pro 4
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
