Model Comparison
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)
vs. GPT-6 Astra (max)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, OpenAI
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)7 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)
100.0 value score
26.2 reasoning / $0.85/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)
$0.38/1M input price
Best Reasoning
GPT-6 Astra (max)
54.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
GPT-6 Astra (max)
76.9 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) is 26.3x cheaper on input tokens than GPT-6 Astra (max).
Speed gap
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) generates about 2.1x as many tokens per second as GPT-6 Astra (max).
Reasoning gap
GPT-6 Astra (max) leads Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) by 28.5 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
GPT-6 Astra (max) leads Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) by 35.0 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
GPT-6 Astra (max)
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Processing terms vary by selected model. Review the current Privacy Policy and DPA before using sensitive data.
OpenAI-compatible inference
Choose from the current model catalog. Processing terms vary by selected model and service.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) | Op GPT-6 Astra (max) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.38/1M | $10.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $2.25/1M | $50.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.85/1M | $20.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | OpenAI |
| Release Date | Apr 16, 2026 | Sep 3, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 128.7 tok/s | 62.5 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2030ms | 250180ms |
| Latency | 43960ms | 250180ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 8.8 |
| Reasoning Score | 26.2 | 54.7 |
| Intelligence | 26.2 | 54.7 |
| Coding | 41.9 | 76.9 |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.38/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
GPT-6 Astra (max) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 54.7 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
GPT-6 Astra (max) reaches a 76.9 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
GPT-6 Astra (max)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
