Model Comparison

Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
vs. Beam 1.0

Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Reflection

Recommended Pick

Beam 1.04 metric wins

Strongest on: Output price, Blended price, Throughput

Lowest Price

Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)

$0.38/1M input price

Differences That Matter

Price gap

Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) is 1.1x cheaper on input tokens than Beam 1.0.

Speed gap

Beam 1.0 generates about 2.9x as many tokens per second as Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning).

Top-pick rationale

Beam 1.0 wins 4 measurable categories, including Output price, Blended price, Throughput, TTFT.

Live compare

Response Face-Off

Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.

10 comparisons left in 24h

Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)

Alibaba

Waiting

TTFT

—

Time

—

tok/s

—

Tokens

—

Cost

—

Waiting

Beam 1.0

Reflection

Waiting

TTFT

—

Time

—

tok/s

—

Tokens

—

Cost

—

Waiting

Which answer was more useful?

Secure AI Chat made in Europe

Chat with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi: open-weight, transparent, no lock-in.

Chat for free

EU-hosted open models, one API

Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.

Get API access

Full Comparison

Metric	Al Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) Alibaba	Top Pick Re Beam 1.0 Reflection
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input Cost	$0.38/1M	$0.40/1M
Output Cost	$2.25/1M	$1.20/1M
Blended (3:1)	$0.84/1M	$0.60/1M
Specifications
Organization	Alibaba	Reflection
Release Date	Apr 16, 2026	Oct 16, 2026
Performance & Speed
Throughput	122.3 tok/s	359.8 tok/s
TTFT	2020ms	690ms
Latency	2020ms	6250ms
Composite Indices
Value Score	—	100.0
Reasoning Score	—	17.7
Intelligence	—	17.7