Model Comparison
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
vs. Reka Flash (Sep '24)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Reka AI
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)6 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Throughput, TTFT
Best Value
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
100.0 value score
24.6 reasoning / $0.85/1M
Lowest Price
Reka Flash (Sep '24)
$0.20/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
24.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
28.1 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Reka Flash (Sep '24) is 1.9x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning).
Speed gap
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) generates about 66.2x as many tokens per second as Reka Flash (Sep '24).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) leads Reka Flash (Sep '24) by 18.6 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) wins 6 measurable categories, including Value, Throughput, TTFT, Latency.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Reka Flash (Sep '24)
Reka AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Processing terms vary by selected model. Review the current Privacy Policy and DPA before using sensitive data.
OpenAI-compatible inference
Choose from the current model catalog. Processing terms vary by selected model and service.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) | Re Reka Flash (Sep '24) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.38/1M | $0.20/1M |
| Output Cost | $2.25/1M | $0.80/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.85/1M | $0.35/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Reka AI |
| Release Date | Apr 16, 2026 | Oct 4, 2024 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 145.0 tok/s | 2.2 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2100ms | 27160ms |
| Latency | 2100ms | 27160ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 59.1 |
| Reasoning Score | 24.6 | 6.0 |
| Intelligence | 24.6 | 6.0 |
| Coding | 28.1 | — |
Key Takeaways
Reka Flash (Sep '24) offers the best value at $0.20/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 24.6 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) reaches a 28.1 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Reka Flash (Sep '24)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
