Model Comparison
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
vs. Solar Mini
Comparing 2 AI models · 8 benchmarks · Alibaba, Upstage
Recommended Pick
Up Solar Mini 6 metric wins Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Solar Mini
100.0 value score
22.5 reasoning / $0.15/1M
Lowest Price
Solar Mini
$0.15/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
41.9 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
17.6 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Solar Mini has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Solar Mini is 2.5x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning).
Speed gap
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) generates about 2.4x as many tokens per second as Solar Mini.
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) leads Solar Mini by 19.4 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Solar Mini wins 6 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Solar Mini
Upstage
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick Up Solar Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.38/1M | $0.15/1M |
| Output Cost | $2.25/1M | $0.15/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.84/1M | $0.15/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Upstage |
| Release Date | Apr 16, 2026 | Jan 25, 2024 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 184.0 tok/s | 76.4 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1414ms | 994ms |
| Latency | 1414ms | 994ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 33.1 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 41.9 | 22.5 |
| Intelligence | 31.5 | 11.9 |
| Coding | 17.6 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 81.7% | — |
| HLE | 12.5% | — |
| MATH 500 | — | 33.1% |
| SciCode | 1.3% | — |
| LCR | 56.7% | — |
| IFBench | 36.2% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 85.1% | 20.2% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 25.8% | — |
Key Takeaways
Solar Mini offers the best value at $0.15/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 41.9 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning) reaches a 17.6 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Solar Mini
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
