Model Comparison
Qwen3.7 Max
vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Anthropic
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3.7 Max5 metric winsStrongest on: Output price, Blended price, Throughput
Best Value
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
100.0 value score
56.0 reasoning / $4.00/1M
Lowest Price
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
$2.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
56.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.7 Max
66.0 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) is 1.3x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.7 Max.
Speed gap
Qwen3.7 Max generates about 1.5x as many tokens per second as Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback).
Reasoning gap
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) leads Qwen3.7 Max by 26.5 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.7 Max wins 5 measurable categories, including Output price, Blended price, Throughput, TTFT.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.7 Max
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
Anthropic
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Use open-weight models like DeepSeek, Qwen and Kimi in one app.
EU-hosted open models, one API
Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3.7 Max | An Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $2.50/1M | $2.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $7.50/1M | $10.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.75/1M | $4.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Anthropic |
| Release Date | May 19, 2026 | Sep 28, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 201.0 tok/s | 134.3 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2230ms | 388540ms |
| Latency | 14210ms | 388540ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 56.2 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 29.5 | 56.0 |
| Intelligence | 29.5 | 56.0 |
| Coding | 66.0 | — |
Key Takeaways
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) offers the best value at $2.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 56.0 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.7 Max reaches a 66.0 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.7 Max
- Code generation
- Software development
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
