Model Comparison
Qwen3.7 Max
vs. V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort)
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Alibaba, DeepSeek
Recommended Pick
Al Qwen3.7 Max 12 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Latency, Reasoning
Best Value
V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort)
100.0 value score
54.9 reasoning / $0.54/1M
Lowest Price
V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort)
$0.43/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.7 Max
58.8 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.7 Max
50.1 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) is 5.7x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.7 Max.
Speed gap
Qwen3.7 Max generates about 1.6x as many tokens per second as V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.7 Max leads V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) by 3.9 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Qwen3.7 Max leads V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) by 6.9 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.7 Max
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort)
DeepSeek
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3.7 Max | De V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $2.50/1M | $0.43/1M |
| Output Cost | $7.50/1M | $0.87/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.75/1M | $0.54/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | DeepSeek |
| Release Date | May 19, 2026 | Apr 24, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 106.3 tok/s | 67.4 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1671ms | 1174ms |
| Latency | 24329ms | 30749ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 15.5 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 58.8 | 54.9 |
| Intelligence | 46.0 | 40.8 |
| Coding | 50.1 | 43.2 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 92.3% | 90.5% |
| HLE | 38.1% | 33.5% |
| SciCode | 48.8% | 46.4% |
| LCR | 69.0% | 65.0% |
| IFBench | 80.5% | 71.3% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 94.7% | 94.2% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 50.8% | 41.7% |
Key Takeaways
V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort) offers the best value at $0.43/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.7 Max has the strongest reasoning profile with a 58.8 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.7 Max reaches a 50.1 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.7 Max
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
