Model Comparison
Qwen3.7 Max
vs. Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Al Qwen3.7 Max 11 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Best Value
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning)
100.0 value score
30.6 reasoning / $0.18/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning)
$0.18/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.7 Max
62.3 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.7 Max
50.1 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) is 13.9x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.7 Max.
Speed gap
Qwen3.7 Max generates about 2.7x as many tokens per second as Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.7 Max leads Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) by 31.7 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Qwen3.7 Max leads Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) by 43.0 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.7 Max
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3.7 Max | Al Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $2.50/1M | $0.18/1M |
| Output Cost | $7.50/1M | $0.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.75/1M | $0.18/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Release Date | May 19, 2026 | Apr 28, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 172.3 tok/s | 64.5 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1638ms | 1303ms |
| Latency | 15619ms | 1303ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 10.0 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 62.3 | 30.6 |
| Intelligence | 56.6 | 10.6 |
| Coding | 50.1 | 7.1 |
| Math | — | 24.3 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 92.3% | 45.2% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 64.3% |
| HLE | 38.1% | 2.8% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 20.2% |
| MATH 500 | — | 82.8% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 24.3% |
| AIME (Original) | — | 24.3% |
| SciCode | 48.8% | 16.8% |
| LCR | 69.0% | 0.0% |
| IFBench | 80.5% | 28.6% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 94.7% | 24.9% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 50.8% | 2.3% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.18/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.7 Max has the strongest reasoning profile with a 62.3 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.7 Max reaches a 50.1 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.7 Max
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
