Model Comparison
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
vs. GPT-6 Astra (max)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, OpenAI
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3.8 2.4T A95B6 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
100.0 value score
46.7 reasoning / $3.00/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
$2.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
GPT-6 Astra (max)
54.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
GPT-6 Astra (max)
76.9 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 5.0x cheaper on input tokens than GPT-6 Astra (max).
Speed gap
GPT-6 Astra (max) generates about 1.6x as many tokens per second as Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B.
Reasoning gap
GPT-6 Astra (max) leads Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B by 8.0 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
GPT-6 Astra (max) leads Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B by 5.0 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
GPT-6 Astra (max)
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Processing terms vary by selected model. Review the current Privacy Policy and DPA before using sensitive data.
OpenAI-compatible inference
Choose from the current model catalog. Processing terms vary by selected model and service.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Op GPT-6 Astra (max) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $2.00/1M | $10.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $6.00/1M | $50.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.00/1M | $20.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | OpenAI |
| Release Date | Aug 12, 2026 | Sep 3, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 40.1 tok/s | 62.5 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2530ms | 250180ms |
| Latency | 52360ms | 250180ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 17.6 |
| Reasoning Score | 46.7 | 54.7 |
| Intelligence | 46.7 | 54.7 |
| Coding | 71.9 | 76.9 |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B offers the best value at $2.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
GPT-6 Astra (max) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 54.7 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
GPT-6 Astra (max) reaches a 76.9 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
GPT-6 Astra (max)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
