Model Comparison
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
vs. Qwen3.8 Max
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3.8-Flash-Next8 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
100.0 value score
39.8 reasoning / $0.23/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
$0.15/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.8 Max
40.2 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
73.1 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 13.3x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.8 Max.
Speed gap
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next generates about 1.4x as many tokens per second as Qwen3.8 Max.
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.8 Max leads Qwen3.8-Flash-Next by 0.4 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads Qwen3.8 Max by 1.3 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3.8 Max
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Al Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.15/1M | $2.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.47/1M | $6.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.23/1M | $3.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Aug 26, 2026 | Aug 3, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 52.4 tok/s | 38.4 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2730ms | 2860ms |
| Latency | 40930ms | 54970ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 7.7 |
| Reasoning Score | 39.8 | 40.2 |
| Intelligence | 39.8 | 40.2 |
| Coding | 73.1 | 71.8 |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next offers the best value at $0.15/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.8 Max has the strongest reasoning profile with a 40.2 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next reaches a 73.1 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
Qwen3.8 Max
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
