Model Comparison
Qwen3.8 Max
vs. Gemini 3.7 Flash (high)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Google
Recommended Pick
GoGemini 3.7 Flash (high)7 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high)
100.0 value score
56.0 reasoning / $1.50/1M
Lowest Price
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high)
$0.75/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.8 Max
58.1 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high)
76.1 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) is 2.7x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.8 Max.
Speed gap
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) generates about 6.5x as many tokens per second as Qwen3.8 Max.
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.8 Max leads Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) by 2.1 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) leads Qwen3.8 Max by 4.3 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.8 Max
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high)
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3.8 Max | Top Pick Go Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $2.00/1M | $0.75/1M |
| Output Cost | $6.00/1M | $3.75/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.00/1M | $1.50/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | |
| Release Date | Aug 3, 2026 | Aug 13, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 49.8 tok/s | 323.3 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2560ms | 15150ms |
| Latency | 42710ms | 15150ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 51.9 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 58.1 | 56.0 |
| Intelligence | 58.1 | 56.0 |
| Coding | 71.8 | 76.1 |
Key Takeaways
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) offers the best value at $0.75/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.8 Max has the strongest reasoning profile with a 58.1 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) reaches a 76.1 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.8 Max
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
