Model Comparison
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning)
vs. Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Anthropic
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning)7 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning)
100.0 value score
11.2 reasoning / $0.41/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning)
$0.15/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback)
56.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning)
17.4 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) is 26.7x cheaper on input tokens than Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback).
Speed gap
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) generates about 2.2x as many tokens per second as Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback).
Reasoning gap
Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback) leads Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) by 44.8 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) wins 7 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback)
Anthropic
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) | An Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.15/1M | $4.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $1.20/1M | $20.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.41/1M | $8.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Anthropic |
| Release Date | Sep 11, 2025 | Sep 17, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 170.3 tok/s | 76.2 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2280ms | 165200ms |
| Latency | 14030ms | 165200ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 25.8 |
| Reasoning Score | 11.2 | 56.0 |
| Intelligence | 11.2 | 56.0 |
| Coding | 17.4 | — |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.15/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 56.0 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) reaches a 17.4 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
Claude Opus 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
