Model Comparison

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
vs. Beam 1.0

Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Reflection

Recommended Pick

Beam 1.03 metric wins

Strongest on: Output price, Throughput, TTFT

Lowest Price

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

$0.21/1M input price

Differences That Matter

Price gap

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is 1.9x cheaper on input tokens than Beam 1.0.

Speed gap

Beam 1.0 generates about 10.5x as many tokens per second as Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct.

Top-pick rationale

Beam 1.0 wins 3 measurable categories, including Output price, Throughput, TTFT.

Live compare

Response Face-Off

Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.

10 comparisons left in 24h

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Alibaba

Waiting

TTFT

—

Time

—

tok/s

—

Tokens

—

Cost

—

Waiting

Beam 1.0

Reflection

Waiting

TTFT

—

Time

—

tok/s

—

Tokens

—

Cost

—

Waiting

Which answer was more useful?

Secure AI Chat made in Europe

Chat with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi: open-weight, transparent, no lock-in.

Chat for free

EU-hosted open models, one API

Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.

Get API access

Full Comparison

Metric	Al Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct Alibaba	Top Pick Re Beam 1.0 Reflection
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input Cost	$0.21/1M	$0.40/1M
Output Cost	$1.39/1M	$1.20/1M
Blended (3:1)	$0.51/1M	$0.60/1M
Specifications
Organization	Alibaba	Reflection
Release Date	Sep 23, 2025	Oct 16, 2026
Performance & Speed
Throughput	37.1 tok/s	389.4 tok/s
TTFT	1160ms	670ms
Latency	1160ms	5810ms
Composite Indices
Value Score	—	100.0
Reasoning Score	—	17.7
Intelligence	—	17.7