Model Comparison
R1 1776
vs. Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
Comparing 2 AI models · 11 benchmarks · Perplexity, ByteDance Seed
Recommended Pick
Pe R1 1776 4 metric wins Strongest on: Input price, Output price, TTFT
Lowest Price
R1 1776
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
55.3 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
16.7 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
R1 1776 is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct.
Reasoning gap
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct leads R1 1776 by 1.6 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
R1 1776 wins 4 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, TTFT, Latency.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
R1 1776
Perplexity
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
ByteDance Seed
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Pe R1 1776 | By Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.21/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.00/1M | $0.57/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.30/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Perplexity | ByteDance Seed |
| Release Date | Feb 18, 2025 | Aug 20, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 37.9 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 1710ms |
| Latency | — | 54468ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 53.7 | 55.3 |
| Intelligence | 12.0 | 25.2 |
| Coding | — | 16.7 |
| Math | — | 84.7 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | — | 72.6% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 81.5% |
| HLE | — | 9.1% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 76.5% |
| MATH 500 | 95.4% | — |
| AIME 2025 | — | 84.7% |
| SciCode | — | 36.5% |
| LCR | — | 57.7% |
| IFBench | — | 41.9% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 49.4% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 6.8% |
Key Takeaways
R1 1776 offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct has the strongest reasoning profile with a 55.3 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct reaches a 16.7 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
R1 1776
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
