Model Comparison
105B (high)
vs. Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Sarvam, ByteDance Seed
Recommended Pick
Sa105B (high)9 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
105B (high)
100.0 value score
31.9 reasoning / $0.07/1M
Lowest Price
105B (high)
$0.04/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
53.9 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
105B (high) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
105B (high) is 5.0x cheaper on input tokens than Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct.
Speed gap
105B (high) generates about 3.7x as many tokens per second as Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct.
Reasoning gap
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct leads 105B (high) by 21.9 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
105B (high) wins 9 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
105B (high)
Sarvam
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
ByteDance Seed
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Sa 105B (high) | By Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.04/1M | $0.21/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.17/1M | $0.57/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.07/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Sarvam | ByteDance Seed |
| Release Date | Mar 6, 2026 | Aug 20, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 142.3 tok/s | 38.7 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1168ms | 1478ms |
| Latency | 15224ms | 53149ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 41.6 |
| Reasoning Score | 31.9 | 53.9 |
| Intelligence | 11.9 | 18.3 |
| Math | — | 84.7 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 73.8% | 72.6% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 81.5% |
| HLE | 10.1% | 9.1% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 76.5% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 84.7% |
| SciCode | 26.4% | 36.5% |
| LCR | 0.0% | 57.7% |
| IFBench | 34.4% | 41.9% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 46.8% | 49.4% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 1.5% | 6.8% |
Key Takeaways
105B (high) offers the best value at $0.04/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct has the strongest reasoning profile with a 53.9 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
105B (high)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
