Model Comparison
105B (high)
vs. Step 3.5 Flash
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Sarvam, StepFun
Recommended Pick
StStep 3.5 Flash3 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Reasoning, Intelligence
Best Value
Step 3.5 Flash
100.0 value score
19.1 reasoning / $0.15/1M
Lowest Price
105B (high)
$0.04/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Step 3.5 Flash
19.1 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Differences That Matter
Best value
Step 3.5 Flash has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
105B (high) is 2.5x cheaper on input tokens than Step 3.5 Flash.
Reasoning gap
Step 3.5 Flash leads 105B (high) by 12.9 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Step 3.5 Flash wins 3 measurable categories, including Value, Reasoning, Intelligence.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
105B (high)
Sarvam
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Step 3.5 Flash
StepFun
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Processing terms vary by selected model. Review the current Privacy Policy and DPA before using sensitive data.
OpenAI-compatible inference
Choose from the current model catalog. Processing terms vary by selected model and service.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Sa 105B (high) | Top Pick St Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.04/1M | $0.10/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.17/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.07/1M | $0.15/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Sarvam | StepFun |
| Release Date | Mar 6, 2026 | Feb 2, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 223.7 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 1140ms |
| Latency | — | 10080ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 67.2 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 6.2 | 19.1 |
| Intelligence | 6.2 | 19.1 |
Key Takeaways
105B (high) offers the best value at $0.04/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Step 3.5 Flash has the strongest reasoning profile with a 19.1 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
105B (high)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Step 3.5 Flash
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
