Model Comparison

105B (high)
vs. Step 5 Preview

Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Sarvam, StepFun

Recommended Pick

Sarvam logo105B (high)4 metric wins

Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price

Best Value

Sarvam logo

105B (high)

100.0 value score

8.8 reasoning / $0.07/1M

Lowest Price

Sarvam logo

105B (high)

$0.04/1M input price

Best Reasoning

StepFun logo

Step 5 Preview

43.7 reasoning score

Blends available reasoning benchmarks

Differences That Matter

Best value

105B (high) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.

Price gap

105B (high) is 25x cheaper on input tokens than Step 5 Preview.

Reasoning gap

Step 5 Preview leads 105B (high) by 34.9 points on reasoning.

Top-pick rationale

105B (high) wins 4 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.

Live compare

Response Face-Off

Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.

10 comparisons left in 24h
Sarvam logo

105B (high)

Sarvam

Waiting

TTFT

Time

tok/s

Tokens

Cost

Waiting
StepFun logo

Step 5 Preview

StepFun

Waiting

TTFT

Time

tok/s

Tokens

Cost

Waiting

Which answer was more useful?

Secure AI Chat made in Europe

Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.

EU-hosted inference

Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.

Full Comparison

Metric
Top Pick
Sarvam logo105B (high)
Sarvam
StepFun logoStep 5 Preview
StepFun
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input Cost$0.04/1M$1.00/1M
Output Cost$0.17/1M$2.70/1M
Blended (3:1)$0.07/1M$1.43/1M
Specifications
OrganizationSarvamStepFun
Release DateMar 6, 2026Sep 18, 2026
Performance & Speed
Throughput83.6 tok/s
TTFT4120ms
Latency28040ms
Composite Indices
Value Score100.025.3
Reasoning Score8.843.7
Intelligence8.843.7

Key Takeaways

105B (high) offers the best value at $0.04/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.

Step 5 Preview has the strongest reasoning profile with a 43.7 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.

All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.

When to Choose Each Model

Sarvam logo

105B (high)

  • Cost-sensitive applications
  • High-volume processing
StepFun logo

Step 5 Preview

  • Complex reasoning tasks
  • Research & analysis