Model Comparison
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
vs. Step 3.7 Flash
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · ByteDance Seed, StepFun
Recommended Pick
StStep 3.7 Flash4 metric winsStrongest on: Input price, Throughput, TTFT
Lowest Price
Step 3.7 Flash
$0.20/1M input price
Differences That Matter
Speed gap
Step 3.7 Flash generates about 5.0x as many tokens per second as Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct.
Top-pick rationale
Step 3.7 Flash wins 4 measurable categories, including Input price, Throughput, TTFT, Latency.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
ByteDance Seed
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Step 3.7 Flash
StepFun
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Chat with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi: open-weight, transparent, no lock-in.
EU-hosted open models, one API
Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.
Full Comparison
| Metric | By Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct | Top Pick St Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.21/1M | $0.20/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.57/1M | $1.15/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.30/1M | $0.44/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | ByteDance Seed | StepFun |
| Release Date | Aug 20, 2025 | May 29, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 39.3 tok/s | 198.0 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2820ms | 2600ms |
| Latency | 53710ms | 12700ms |
Key Takeaways
Step 3.7 Flash offers the best value at $0.20/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Step 3.7 Flash
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
