Model Comparison

Solar Mini
vs. Step 3.7 Flash

Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Upstage, StepFun

Recommended Pick

Upstage logoSolar Mini3 metric wins

Strongest on: Input price, Output price, Blended price

Lowest Price

Upstage logo

Solar Mini

$0.15/1M input price

Differences That Matter

Price gap

Solar Mini is 1.3x cheaper on input tokens than Step 3.7 Flash.

Top-pick rationale

Solar Mini wins 3 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, Blended price.

Live compare

Response Face-Off

Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.

10 comparisons left in 24h
Upstage logo

Solar Mini

Upstage

Waiting

TTFT

—

Time

—

tok/s

—

Tokens

—

Cost

—

Waiting
StepFun logo

Step 3.7 Flash

StepFun

Waiting

TTFT

—

Time

—

tok/s

—

Tokens

—

Cost

—

Waiting

Which answer was more useful?

Secure AI Chat made in Europe

Chat with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi: open-weight, transparent, no lock-in.

EU-hosted open models, one API

Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.

Full Comparison

Metric
Top Pick
Upstage logoSolar Mini
Upstage
StepFun logoStep 3.7 Flash
StepFun
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input Cost$0.15/1M$0.20/1M
Output Cost$0.15/1M$1.15/1M
Blended (3:1)$0.15/1M$0.44/1M
Specifications
OrganizationUpstageStepFun
Release DateJan 25, 2024May 29, 2026
Performance & Speed
Throughput—198.0 tok/s
TTFT—2600ms
Latency—12700ms

Key Takeaways

Solar Mini offers the best value at $0.15/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.

All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.

When to Choose Each Model

Upstage logo

Solar Mini

  • Cost-sensitive applications
  • High-volume processing
StepFun logo

Step 3.7 Flash

  • General-purpose AI
  • Versatile applications