Model Comparison
Hy4
vs. Trinity Large Thinking
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Tencent, Arcee AI
Lowest Price
Hy4
$0.83/1M input price
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Hy4
Tencent
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Trinity Large Thinking
Arcee AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Chat with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi: open-weight, transparent, no lock-in.
EU-hosted open models, one API
Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Te Hy4 | Ar Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.83/1M | — |
| Output Cost | $2.50/1M | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.25/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Tencent | Arcee AI |
| Release Date | Nov 3, 2026 | Apr 1, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 34.6 | — |
| Intelligence | 34.6 | — |
Key Takeaways
Hy4 offers the best value at $0.83/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Hy4
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Trinity Large Thinking
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications