AI Model Ranking (LLM Leaderboard)
Cheapest AI Models
Language models ranked by Artificial Analysis Index
Best Picks
Start with these models
Quick recommendations from the current benchmark, speed, and pricing data.
Best Overall
Claude Opus 4.8 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
by Anthropic
61.4 Highest intelligence score
Best Value
Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning)
by Alibaba
100 Value score Β· $0.06 blended
Best for Coding
GPT-5.5 (xhigh)
by OpenAI
59.1 Highest coding index
Fastest Usable
Step 3.7 Flash
by StepFun
398 tok/s Fastest model with solid intelligence
| Model AI model name and provider organization | Intelligence Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index - composite reasoning and capability score across the benchmark suite | Value Quality, speed, and blended token price combined into a relative value score | Speed Inference throughput in tokens per second - how fast the model generates responses | Context Maximum context window size - how much text, code, or conversation the model can process at once | Price Cost per 1 million tokens β input (text you send) / output (text the model generates) | Release When the model was released - newer models may have more capabilities | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 Qwen3.5 0.8B (Reasoning) by Alibaba | 10.5 | 40 | N/A | N/A | $0.01 / $0.05 | Mar 2, 2026 | |
| #2 Qwen3.5 0.8B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba | 9.9 | 45 | 89 tok/s | N/A | $0.01 / $0.05 | Mar 2, 2026 | |
| #3 Qwen3.5 2B (Reasoning) by Alibaba | 16.3 | 44 | N/A | N/A | $0.02 / $0.10 | Mar 2, 2026 | |
| #4 Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba | 14.7 | 66 | 324 tok/s | N/A | $0.02 / $0.10 | Mar 2, 2026 | |
| #5 Gemma 3n E4B Instruct by Google | 6.4 | 22 | 51 tok/s | N/A | $0.02 / $0.04 | Jun 26, 2025 | |
| | |||||||
| #6 30B (high) by Sarvam | 12.3 | 51 | 161 tok/s | N/A | $0.03 / $0.11 | Mar 6, 2026 | |
| #7 LFM2 24B A2B by Liquid AI | 10.5 | 38 | 114 tok/s | N/A | $0.03 / $0.12 | Feb 25, 2026 | |
| #8 Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) by Alibaba | 27.1 | 100 | 197 tok/s | N/A | $0.03 / $0.15 | Mar 2, 2026 | |
| #9 Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba | 22.6 | 83 | 209 tok/s | N/A | $0.03 / $0.15 | Mar 2, 2026 | |
| #10 Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning) by IBM | 7.0 | 22 | 442 tok/s | N/A | $0.03 / $0.25 | Apr 16, 2025 | |
| #11 Nova Micro by Amazon | 10.3 | 38 | 316 tok/s | N/A | $0.04 / $0.14 | Dec 3, 2024 | |
| #12 Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Reasoning) by NVIDIA | 14.8 | 47 | 117 tok/s | 128K | $0.04 / $0.16 | Aug 18, 2025 | |
| #13 Gemma 3 4B Instruct by Google | 6.3 | 15 | N/A | 131K | $0.04 / $0.08 | Mar 12, 2025 | |
| #14 105B (high) by Sarvam | 18.2 | 46 | 94 tok/s | N/A | $0.04 / $0.17 | Mar 6, 2026 | |
| #15 Llama 3 Instruct 8B by Meta | 6.4 | 16 | 89 tok/s | N/A | $0.04 / $0.14 | Apr 18, 2024 | |
| #16 gpt-oss-20B (high) by OpenAI | 24.5 | 75 | 268 tok/s | 131K | $0.05 / $0.20 | Aug 5, 2025 | |
| #17 Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning) by NVIDIA | 13.2 | 41 | 135 tok/s | 128K | $0.05 / $0.20 | Aug 18, 2025 | |
| #18 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) by NVIDIA | 13.2 | 29 | 89 tok/s | 256K | $0.05 / $0.20 | Dec 15, 2025 | |
| #19 Granite 4.1 8B by IBM | 12.4 | 45 | 133 tok/s | N/A | $0.05 / $0.10 | Apr 29, 2026 | |
| #20 GPT-5 nano (minimal) by OpenAI | 13.8 | 34 | 154 tok/s | 400K | $0.05 / $0.40 | Aug 7, 2025 | |
| #21 GPT-5 nano (medium) by OpenAI | 25.9 | 63 | 167 tok/s | 400K | $0.05 / $0.40 | Aug 7, 2025 | |
| #22 GPT-5 nano (high) by OpenAI | 26.8 | 65 | 155 tok/s | 400K | $0.05 / $0.40 | Aug 7, 2025 | |
| #23 Llama 3.2 Instruct 1B by Meta | 6.3 | 19 | 93 tok/s | N/A | $0.05 / $0.05 | Sep 25, 2024 | |
| #24 Llama 2 Chat 7B by Meta | 9.7 | 22 | 101 tok/s | N/A | $0.05 / $0.25 | Jul 18, 2023 | |
| #25 Qwen2.5 Turbo by Alibaba | 12.0 | 22 | 67 tok/s | N/A | $0.05 / $0.20 | Nov 18, 2024 | |
| #26 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA | 24.3 | 71 | 134 tok/s | 256K | $0.06 / $0.22 | Dec 15, 2025 | |
| #27 gpt-oss-20B (low) by OpenAI | 20.8 | 61 | 273 tok/s | 131K | $0.06 / $0.20 | Aug 5, 2025 | |
| #28 Granite 4.0 H Small by IBM | 10.8 | 30 | 418 tok/s | N/A | $0.06 / $0.25 | Sep 22, 2025 | |
| #29 Nova Lite by Amazon | 12.7 | 35 | 189 tok/s | N/A | $0.06 / $0.24 | Dec 3, 2024 | |
| #30 GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) by Z AI | 22.1 | 48 | 118 tok/s | 203K | $0.07 / $0.40 | Jan 19, 2026 | |
| #31 GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) by Z AI | 30.1 | 52 | 93 tok/s | 203K | $0.07 / $0.40 | Jan 19, 2026 | |
| #32 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning by NVIDIA | 21.4 | 53 | 285 tok/s | N/A | $0.07 / $0.30 | Apr 29, 2026 | |
| #33 Small 3 by Mistral | 12.7 | 36 | 154 tok/s | N/A | $0.07 / $0.19 | Jan 30, 2025 | |
| #34 Qwen3 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba | 12.5 | 19 | 70 tok/s | 131K | $0.08 / $0.29 | Apr 28, 2025 | |
| #35 Small 3.2 by Mistral | 15.1 | 38 | 127 tok/s | N/A | $0.09 / $0.25 | Jun 20, 2025 | |
| #36 Gemma 3 12B Instruct by Google | 8.8 | 13 | N/A | 131K | $0.09 / $0.29 | Mar 12, 2025 | |
| #37 Qwen3 30B A3B (Reasoning) by Alibaba | 15.3 | 20 | 69 tok/s | 131K | $0.09 / $0.45 | Apr 28, 2025 | |
| #38 Ministral 3 3B by Mistral | 11.2 | 32 | 203 tok/s | N/A | $0.10 / $0.10 | Dec 2, 2025 | |
| #39 Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Non-reasoning) by NVIDIA | 14.6 | 19 | 44 tok/s | N/A | $0.10 / $0.40 | Jul 25, 2025 | |
| #40 Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) by NVIDIA | 18.7 | 24 | 44 tok/s | N/A | $0.10 / $0.40 | Jul 25, 2025 | |
| #41 Step 3.5 Flash 2603 by StepFun | 38.5 | 90 | 238 tok/s | 262K | $0.10 / $0.30 | Apr 2, 2026 | |
| #42 Olmo 3 7B Instruct by Allen Institute for AI | 8.1 | 12 | N/A | N/A | $0.10 / $0.20 | Nov 20, 2025 | |
| #43 MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) by Xiaomi | 41.5 | 97 | 126 tok/s | 262K | $0.10 / $0.30 | Dec 16, 2025 | |
| #44 MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) by Xiaomi | 30.3 | 71 | 126 tok/s | 262K | $0.10 / $0.30 | Dec 16, 2025 | |
| #45 Apertus 8B Instruct by Swiss AI Initiative | 5.9 | 9 | N/A | N/A | $0.10 / $0.20 | Sep 2, 2025 | |
| #46 Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) by Alibaba | 32.4 | 52 | 72 tok/s | 262K | $0.10 / $0.15 | Mar 2, 2026 | |
| #47 Qwen3.5 Omni Flash by Alibaba | 25.9 | 45 | 226 tok/s | N/A | $0.10 / $0.80 | Mar 30, 2026 | |
| #48 Ling 2.6 Flash by InclusionAI | 26.2 | 37 | N/A | 262K | $0.10 / $0.30 | Apr 21, 2026 | |
| #49 GPT-4.1 nano by OpenAI | 13.0 | 25 | 112 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.10 / $0.40 | Apr 14, 2025 | |
| #50 Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B by Meta | 11.8 | 34 | 203 tok/s | N/A | $0.10 / $0.10 | Jul 23, 2024 | |
| #51 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning) by Google | 17.6 | 38 | 307 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.10 / $0.40 | Jun 17, 2025 | |
| #52 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) by Google | 21.6 | 28 | N/A | N/A | $0.10 / $0.40 | Sep 8, 2025 | |
| #53 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) by Google | 19.4 | 25 | N/A | 1.0M | $0.10 / $0.40 | Sep 25, 2025 | |
| #54 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Non-reasoning) by Google | 12.7 | 27 | 231 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.10 / $0.40 | Jun 17, 2025 | |
| #55 Devstral Small (Jul '25) by Mistral | 15.2 | 21 | 37 tok/s | N/A | $0.10 / $0.30 | Jul 10, 2025 | |
| #56 Step 3.5 Flash by StepFun | 37.8 | 88 | 220 tok/s | 262K | $0.10 / $0.30 | Feb 2, 2026 | |
| #57 MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) by Xiaomi | 39.2 | 91 | 130 tok/s | 262K | $0.10 / $0.30 | Dec 16, 2025 | |
| #58 Small 3.1 by Mistral | 14.5 | 35 | 156 tok/s | N/A | $0.10 / $0.23 | Mar 17, 2025 | |
| #59 Gemma 3 27B Instruct by Google | 10.3 | 15 | N/A | 131K | $0.11 / $0.25 | Mar 12, 2025 | |
| #60 Qwen3 4B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba | 12.5 | 16 | N/A | N/A | $0.11 / $0.42 | Apr 28, 2025 | |
| #61 Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba | 5.7 | 7 | N/A | N/A | $0.11 / $0.42 | Apr 28, 2025 | |
| #62 Qwen3 4B (Reasoning) by Alibaba | 14.2 | 12 | N/A | N/A | $0.11 / $1.26 | Apr 28, 2025 | |
| #63 Qwen3 1.7B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba | 6.8 | 9 | N/A | N/A | $0.11 / $0.42 | Apr 28, 2025 | |
| #64 Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) by Alibaba | 6.5 | 6 | N/A | N/A | $0.11 / $1.26 | Apr 28, 2025 | |
| #65 Qwen3 8B (Reasoning) by Alibaba | 13.2 | 12 | 66 tok/s | 131K | $0.11 / $1.15 | Apr 28, 2025 | |
| #66 Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) by Alibaba | 8.0 | 7 | N/A | N/A | $0.11 / $1.26 | Apr 28, 2025 | |
| #67 Hy3-preview (Reasoning) by Tencent | 41.9 | 66 | 98 tok/s | 262K | $0.12 / $0.43 | Apr 23, 2026 | |
| #68 Hy3-preview (Non-reasoning) by Tencent | 33.7 | 46 | 85 tok/s | 262K | $0.12 / $0.43 | Apr 23, 2026 | |
| #69 Phi-4 by Microsoft | 10.4 | 12 | 40 tok/s | 16K | $0.13 / $0.50 | Dec 12, 2024 | |
| #70 Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) by Google | 31.2 | 38 | N/A | 262K | $0.13 / $0.40 | Apr 2, 2026 | |
| #71 Gemma 4 26B A4B (Non-reasoning) by Google | 27.1 | 33 | 62 tok/s | 262K | $0.13 / $0.40 | Apr 2, 2026 | |
| #72 Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Non-reasoning) by Nous Research | 12.6 | 17 | 84 tok/s | N/A | $0.13 / $0.40 | Aug 27, 2025 | |
| #73 Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) by Nous Research | 16.0 | 23 | 88 tok/s | N/A | $0.13 / $0.40 | Aug 27, 2025 | |
| #74 Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) by Google | 32.3 | 39 | 28 tok/s | 262K | $0.14 / $0.40 | Apr 2, 2026 | |
| #75 V4 Flash (Reasoning, High Effort) by DeepSeek | 46.0 | 60 | N/A | 1.0M | $0.14 / $0.28 | Apr 24, 2026 | |
| #76 V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) by DeepSeek | 46.5 | 96 | 120 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.14 / $0.28 | Apr 24, 2026 | |
| #77 V4 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek | 36.5 | 72 | 114 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.14 / $0.28 | Apr 24, 2026 | |
| #78 MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi | 49.0 | 69 | 82 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.14 / $0.28 | Apr 22, 2026 | |
| #79 Ring-flash-2.0 by InclusionAI | 14.0 | 15 | N/A | N/A | $0.14 / $0.57 | Sep 19, 2025 | |
| #80 Ling-flash-2.0 by InclusionAI | 15.7 | 17 | 72 tok/s | N/A | $0.14 / $0.57 | Sep 17, 2025 | |
| #81 gpt-oss-120b (low) by OpenAI | 24.5 | 43 | 367 tok/s | 131K | $0.15 / $0.60 | Aug 5, 2025 | |
| #82 gpt-oss-120b (high) by OpenAI | 33.3 | 59 | 367 tok/s | 131K | $0.15 / $0.60 | Aug 5, 2025 | |
| #83 Small 4 (Reasoning) by Mistral | 27.8 | 49 | 168 tok/s | N/A | $0.15 / $0.60 | Mar 16, 2026 | |
| #84 Ministral 3 8B by Mistral | 14.8 | 28 | 102 tok/s | N/A | $0.15 / $0.15 | Dec 2, 2025 | |
| #85 Small 4 (Non-reasoning) by Mistral | 18.6 | 33 | 156 tok/s | N/A | $0.15 / $0.60 | Mar 16, 2026 | |
| #86 GPT-4o mini by OpenAI | 12.6 | 13 | 70 tok/s | 128K | $0.15 / $0.60 | Jul 18, 2024 | |
| #87 Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B by Meta | 9.7 | 14 | 52 tok/s | N/A | $0.15 / $0.15 | Sep 25, 2024 | |
| #88 Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb '25) by Google | 18.5 | 20 | N/A | N/A | $0.15 / $0.60 | Feb 5, 2025 | |
| #89 Solar Mini by Upstage | 11.9 | 17 | 77 tok/s | N/A | $0.15 / $0.15 | Jan 25, 2024 | |
| #90 Qwen3 32B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba | 14.5 | 20 | 98 tok/s | 131K | $0.15 / $0.59 | Apr 28, 2025 | |
| #91 Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Instruct by Alibaba | 15.0 | 25 | 108 tok/s | N/A | $0.15 / $0.40 | Jul 29, 2025 | |
| #92 Llama 4 Scout by Meta | 13.5 | 19 | 106 tok/s | 10.0M | $0.17 / $0.66 | Apr 5, 2025 | |
| #93 GLM-4.5-Air by Z AI | 23.2 | 21 | 69 tok/s | 131K | $0.17 / $0.98 | Jul 28, 2025 | |
| #94 Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba | 10.6 | 13 | 64 tok/s | 131K | $0.18 / $0.20 | Apr 28, 2025 | |
| #95 Qwen3 VL 8B (Reasoning) by Alibaba | 16.7 | 19 | 138 tok/s | N/A | $0.18 / $2.10 | Oct 14, 2025 | |
| #96 Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct by Alibaba | 14.3 | 23 | 148 tok/s | 256K | $0.18 / $0.70 | Oct 14, 2025 | |
| #97 Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct by Alibaba | 20.0 | 20 | 82 tok/s | 160K | $0.19 / $0.84 | Jul 31, 2025 | |
| #98 Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) by Alibaba | 16.5 | 22 | 98 tok/s | 131K | $0.20 / $0.52 | Apr 28, 2025 | |
| #99 GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh) by OpenAI | 44.0 | 58 | 165 tok/s | 400K | $0.20 / $1.25 | Mar 17, 2026 | |
| #100 GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning) by OpenAI | 24.4 | 32 | 158 tok/s | 400K | $0.20 / $1.25 | Mar 17, 2026 | |
Showing 100 of 354 models
Understanding the AI Model Leaderboard
This comprehensive AI model leaderboard helps you compare and choose the best large language models (LLMs) for your needs. We track standardized AI benchmarks, token pricing, inference speed, and model capabilities across all major AI providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, and DeepSeek.
Core AI Benchmarks Explained
Key Metrics to Consider
How to Choose the Right AI Model for Your Use Case
For Research & Analysis
Prioritize models with high MMLU-Pro (70%+) and GPQA (60%+) scores for complex reasoning tasks, academic research, and technical documentation
For Cost Optimization
Sort by input/output pricing - smaller models often deliver 80% of flagship performance at 10% of the cost for simple tasks
For Math & STEM
Filter by Math Index or AIME 2025 scores (50%+) for quantitative analysis, engineering calculations, and scientific applications
All benchmark scores and pricing data are updated daily from Artificial Analysis to reflect the latest model versions and capabilities. Use the sort filters above to find AI models by intelligence, cost, coding ability, math performance, speed, or release date.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is MMLU-Pro and why is it the standard AI intelligence benchmark?
MMLU-Pro (Massive Multitask Language Understanding - Professional) is the most comprehensive AI benchmark, testing models across 14 academic subjects including mathematics, science, history, law, and ethics. Scores range from 46% (basic competency) to 87% (near-expert level). Models scoring above 75% demonstrate strong general intelligence suitable for professional applications, while scores below 60% indicate limitations in complex reasoning tasks.
What does GPQA measure and which models score highest?
GPQA (Graduate-level Google-Proof Q&A) tests PhD-level reasoning with questions designed to be "Google-proof" - requiring deep understanding rather than simple fact retrieval. Top models like GPT-5.1 (87.3%), GPT-5 mini (82.8%), and o3 (82.7%) excel at GPQA, making them ideal for research, technical analysis, and complex problem-solving. Models below 50% GPQA struggle with advanced reasoning and may provide superficial answers to complex questions.
What is AIME 2025 and how does it evaluate AI mathematical ability?
AIME 2025 (American Invitational Mathematics Examination) is an elite math competition benchmark that tests advanced problem-solving, algebra, geometry, and number theory. Scores above 80% (like GPT-5 Codex at 98.7% or GPT-5.1 at 94%) indicate exceptional mathematical reasoning suitable for engineering, scientific computing, and quantitative analysis. Models scoring below 50% may struggle with multi-step mathematical problems or require explicit problem breakdown.
How is AI model pricing calculated and what's considered cost-effective?
AI model pricing is measured per 1 million tokens (approximately 750,000 words). Input pricing covers text you send, while output pricing covers generated responses. Budget models like Llama 3.3 70B cost $0.54/$0.71 per million tokens, mid-tier models like GPT-5 nano cost $0.05/$0.40, while premium models like GPT-5 cost $1.25/$10. For typical applications with 3:1 input-to-output ratio, budget models can be 10-20x cheaper than flagship models while maintaining 70-80% performance.
Which AI models are best for coding and programming tasks?
Sort by Coding Index to see top programming models. Our Coding Index combines LiveCodeBench, SciCode, and coding benchmarks. Top performers include GPT-5.1 (57.5 index), GPT-5 mini (51.4), and GPT-5 Codex (53.5). These models excel at code generation, debugging, refactoring, and explaining complex algorithms. For budget-conscious developers, models with 40+ coding index scores offer excellent value for routine programming tasks.
How often are AI model benchmarks and rankings updated?
Our leaderboard syncs daily with Artificial Analysis API to ensure benchmark scores (MMLU-Pro, GPQA, AIME 2025), pricing, and inference speed data reflect the latest model versions. New model releases appear immediately under the "Newest" sort option. Benchmark scores can change when providers release updated versions - for example, GPT-5.1 released in November 2025 achieved 69.7 intelligence compared to GPT-5's 68.5 from August 2025.
What inference speed (tokens/second) do I need for my application?
Inference speed determines how fast models generate responses. For real-time chatbots and interactive applications, target 100+ tokens/second (models like gpt-oss-120B at 340 tok/s). For background processing and batch jobs, 50-100 tok/s is sufficient. Premium reasoning models like GPT-5 (103 tok/s) balance speed and capability. Note that higher inference speed doesn't always mean better quality - slower models often deliver more thoughtful, detailed responses.
Can I test these AI models for free before committing?
Yes! Try our free AI chat interface to test different models instantly without creating an account. Many providers also offer free tiers: OpenAI (ChatGPT with daily limits), Anthropic (Claude with usage caps), Google (Gemini free tier), and open-source models like Llama 3.3. Compare performance on your specific use case before upgrading to paid plans.