Model Comparison
Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning)
vs. Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) has not been available at LLMBase since 26 October 2026. Open alternative: DeepSeek V4 Pro →
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Deep Cogito, Anthropic
Lowest Price
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
$4.00/1M input price
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning)
Deep Cogito
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
Anthropic
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
EU-hosted open models, one API
Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.
Full Comparison
| Metric | De Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning) | An Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | — | $4.00/1M |
| Output Cost | — | $20.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $8.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Deep Cogito | Anthropic |
| Release Date | Nov 18, 2025 | Sep 22, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 96.6 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 632760ms |
| Latency | — | 632760ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | — | 58.4 |
| Intelligence | — | 58.4 |
Key Takeaways
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) offers the best value at $4.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Cogito v2.1 (Reasoning)
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
