Model Comparison
Beam 1.0
vs. 105B (High)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Reflection, Sarvam
Recommended Pick
ReBeam 1.03 metric winsStrongest on: Throughput, TTFT, Latency
Lowest Price
105B (High)
$0.04/1M input price
Differences That Matter
Price gap
105B (High) is 9.5x cheaper on input tokens than Beam 1.0.
Speed gap
Beam 1.0 generates about 2.1x as many tokens per second as 105B (High).
Top-pick rationale
Beam 1.0 wins 3 measurable categories, including Throughput, TTFT, Latency.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Beam 1.0
Reflection
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
105B (High)
Sarvam
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Chat with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi: open-weight, transparent, no lock-in.
EU-hosted open models, one API
Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Re Beam 1.0 | Sa 105B (High) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.40/1M | $0.04/1M |
| Output Cost | $1.20/1M | $0.17/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.60/1M | $0.07/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Reflection | Sarvam |
| Release Date | Oct 16, 2026 | Mar 6, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 388.6 tok/s | 184.7 tok/s |
| TTFT | 700ms | 1660ms |
| Latency | 5850ms | 12490ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 17.7 | — |
| Intelligence | 17.7 | — |
Key Takeaways
105B (High) offers the best value at $0.04/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Beam 1.0
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
105B (High)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
