AI Model Ranking (LLM Leaderboard)
Best AI Math Models
Language models ranked by Artificial Analysis Index
Best Picks
Start with these models
Quick recommendations from the current benchmark, speed, and pricing data.
Model AI model name and provider organization | Intelligence Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index - composite reasoning and capability score across the benchmark suite | Value Score Quality, speed, and blended token price combined into a relative value score | Speed Inference throughput in tokens per second - how fast the model generates responses | Context Maximum context window size - how much text, code, or conversation the model can process at once | Price Cost per 1 million tokens — input (text you send) / output (text the model generates) | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
#1 GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) by Z AI · Aug 11, 2025 | 1.4 | 1 | 59 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.60/$1.80 | |
#2 Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) by Google · May 19, 2026 | 41.9 | 27 | 206 tok/s | 1.0M | $1.50/$9.00 | |
#3 MiMo-V2.5-Pro by Xiaomi · Apr 22, 2026 | 32.6 | 32 | 35 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.43/$0.87 | |
#4 JT-35B-Flash by China Mobile · May 14, 2026 | 21.8 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#5 Mercury 2 by Inception · Feb 20, 2026 | 14.9 | 29 | 821 tok/s | 260K | $0.25/$0.75 | |
OpenAI-compatible inferenceChoose from the current model catalog. Processing terms vary by selected model and service. Secure AI Chat made in EuropeProcessing terms vary by selected model. Review the current Privacy Policy and DPA before using sensitive data. | ||||||
#6 Qwen3.5 Omni Plus by Alibaba · Mar 30, 2026 | 24.0 | 23 | 124 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.40/$4.80 | |
#7 Nova 2.0 Omni (medium) by Amazon · Nov 26, 2025 | 14.7 | 15 | N/A | N/A | $0.30/$2.50 | |
#8 GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh) by OpenAI · Dec 11, 2025 | 33.0 | 14 | N/A | 1.1M | $1.75/$14.00 | |
#9 Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba · Feb 24, 2026 | 20.6 | 24 | 145 tok/s | 262K | $0.40/$3.20 | |
#10 Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning) by Google · Jun 3, 2026 | 7.3 | 20 | 110 tok/s | 262K | $0.10/$0.30 | |
#11 Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) by Google · May 19, 2026 | 28.0 | 18 | 189 tok/s | 131K | $1.50/$9.00 | |
#12 Claude 3.5 Haiku by Anthropic · Oct 22, 2024 | 6.5 | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#13 GPT-3.5 Turbo by OpenAI · Nov 30, 2022 | 1.0 | 1 | N/A | 1.1M | $0.50/$1.50 | |
#14 Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Jan '25) by Google · Jan 21, 2025 | 7.4 | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#15 Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B by Alibaba · Nov 11, 2024 | 1.6 | N/A | N/A | 262K | N/A/N/A | |
#16 Sonar Reasoning by Perplexity · Jan 28, 2025 | 5.9 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#17 Gemma 3 270M by Google · Aug 14, 2025 | 1.0 | N/A | N/A | 262K | N/A/N/A | |
#18 Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning) by SpaceXAI · Mar 10, 2026 | 29.5 | 16 | N/A | 500K | $2.00/$6.00 | |
#19 GPT-5.1 Codex (high) by OpenAI · Nov 13, 2025 | 27.9 | 14 | N/A | 1.1M | $1.25/$10.00 | |
#20 Muse Spark 1.2 (xhigh) by Meta · Aug 5, 2026 | 46.8 | 40 | 260 tok/s | 1.0M | $1.25/$4.25 | |
#21 GPT-5.6 Luna (low) by OpenAI · Jul 9, 2026 | 25.8 | 41 | 110 tok/s | 1.1M | $0.20/$1.20 | |
#22 Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) by Anthropic · Sep 1, 2026 | 47.8 | 8 | 56 tok/s | 1.0M | $10.00/$50.00 | |
#23 Medium 3.1 by Mistral · Aug 12, 2025 | 8.4 | 11 | 124 tok/s | 262K | $0.40/$2.00 | |
#24 GPT-5 nano (minimal) by OpenAI · Aug 7, 2025 | 2.4 | 8 | 156 tok/s | 400K | $0.05/$0.40 | |
#25 Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (May' 25) by Google · May 6, 2025 | 16.1 | 8 | N/A | 1.0M | $1.25/$10.00 | |
#26 o3-mini (high) by OpenAI · Jan 31, 2025 | 9.6 | 8 | 238 tok/s | N/A | $1.10/$4.40 | |
#27 o1-preview by OpenAI · Sep 12, 2024 | 11.0 | 2 | N/A | N/A | $16.50/$66.00 | |
#28 V3.2 Exp (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek · Sep 29, 2025 | 15.1 | 26 | N/A | 1.0M | $0.28/$0.42 | |
#29 1.1 by Apodex · Aug 30, 2026 | 34.9 | 34 | N/A | N/A | $0.30/$3.00 | |
#30 GPT-5.6 Sol (low) by OpenAI · Jul 9, 2026 | 40.8 | 10 | 67 tok/s | 1.1M | $4.00/$20.00 | |
#31 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct by Alibaba · Jul 22, 2025 | 11.9 | 5 | 57 tok/s | 262K | $1.50/$7.50 | |
#32 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google · Jul 21, 2026 | 27.6 | 36 | 371 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.30/$2.50 | |
#33 Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba · Mar 2, 2026 | 1.0 | N/A | N/A | 262K | N/A/N/A | |
#34 Devstral 2 by Mistral · Dec 9, 2025 | 12.7 | N/A | 118 tok/s | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#35 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct '24) by Anthropic · Oct 22, 2024 | 4.2 | 2 | N/A | 1.0M | $3.00/$15.00 | |
#36 V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) by DeepSeek · Sep 22, 2025 | 23.5 | 16 | N/A | 1.0M | $1.64/$2.75 | |
#37 Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct by Alibaba · Sep 22, 2025 | 1.0 | 1 | 92 tok/s | 262K | $0.25/$0.97 | |
#38 Grok Build 0.1 0616 by SpaceXAI · Jun 16, 2026 | 31.7 | 20 | 67 tok/s | 256K | $1.00/$2.00 | |
#39 Granite 4.2 3B by IBM · Aug 25, 2026 | 10.7 | 56 | 211 tok/s | 131K | $0.03/$0.12 | |
#40 Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (medium) by Amazon · Nov 27, 2025 | 15.5 | 9 | 117 tok/s | N/A | $1.25/$10.00 | |
#41 Inkling (xhigh) by Thinking Machines · Jul 15, 2026 | 32.2 | 17 | 73 tok/s | 524K | $1.00/$4.05 | |
#42 K2.6 by Kimi · Apr 20, 2026 | 35.8 | 20 | 46 tok/s | 262K | $0.95/$4.00 | |
#43 R1 (Jan '25) by DeepSeek · Jan 20, 2025 | 12.0 | 7 | N/A | 1.0M | $2.00/$4.00 | |
#44 R1 Distill Llama 8B by DeepSeek · Jan 20, 2025 | 1.0 | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#45 Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba · Apr 28, 2025 | 1.0 | N/A | N/A | 262K | N/A/N/A | |
#46 Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) by Alibaba · Feb 16, 2026 | 26.1 | 20 | 91 tok/s | 262K | $0.60/$3.60 | |
#47 LFM2 1.2B by Liquid AI · Jul 10, 2025 | 1.0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#48 K2.6 (Non-reasoning) by Kimi · Apr 20, 2026 | 27.7 | 15 | 46 tok/s | 262K | $0.95/$4.00 | |
#49 Magistral Small 1 by Mistral · Jun 10, 2025 | 5.0 | N/A | N/A | 262K | N/A/N/A | |
#50 Granite 4.2 30B by IBM · Aug 25, 2026 | 16.5 | 23 | 76 tok/s | 131K | $0.16/$0.65 | |
#51 LFM 40B by Liquid AI · Sep 30, 2024 | 1.0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#52 M2.5 by MiniMax · Feb 12, 2026 | 26.8 | 34 | 96 tok/s | 205K | $0.30/$1.20 | |
#53 Small 4 (Non-reasoning) by Mistral · Mar 16, 2026 | 6.6 | 15 | 148 tok/s | 262K | $0.15/$0.60 | |
#54 Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort) by Anthropic · Jul 24, 2026 | 53.4 | 12 | 56 tok/s | 1.0M | $5.00/$25.00 | |
#55 Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) by Anthropic · Feb 24, 2025 | 20.5 | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#56 Claude Sonnet 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort) by Anthropic · Jun 30, 2026 | — | N/A | 61 tok/s | 1.0M | $2.00/$10.00 | |
#57 MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) by Xiaomi · Dec 16, 2025 | 26.4 | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#58 GLM-5-Turbo by Z AI · Mar 15, 2026 | 31.0 | N/A | N/A | 203K | N/A/N/A | |
#59 Ling-1T by InclusionAI · Oct 8, 2025 | 6.9 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#60 gpt-oss-20b (low) by OpenAI · Aug 5, 2025 | 8.4 | 31 | 227 tok/s | 1.1M | $0.07/$0.20 | |
#61 Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning) by Alibaba · Feb 24, 2026 | 26.9 | 22 | 76 tok/s | 262K | $0.30/$2.40 | |
#62 o3 by OpenAI · Apr 16, 2025 | 23.7 | 14 | 116 tok/s | N/A | $2.00/$8.00 | |
#63 Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24) by Google · May 15, 2024 | 1.0 | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#64 K-EXAONE 2.0 by LG AI Research · Aug 12, 2026 | 23.1 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#65 Qwen3 4B (Reasoning) by Alibaba · Apr 28, 2025 | 2.7 | N/A | N/A | 262K | N/A/N/A | |
#66 GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI · Aug 26, 2026 | 46.2 | 68 | 47 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.15/$0.50 | |
#67 V3.1 (Reasoning) by DeepSeek · Aug 21, 2025 | 14.5 | 15 | N/A | 1.0M | $0.59/$1.69 | |
#68 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) by NVIDIA · Mar 18, 2025 | 6.4 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#69 Step 3.5 Flash 2603 by StepFun · Apr 2, 2026 | 19.5 | 60 | 217 tok/s | 256K | $0.10/$0.30 | |
#70 Large 2 (Jul '24) by Mistral · Jul 24, 2024 | 1.7 | 1 | N/A | 262K | $2.00/$6.00 | |
#71 Solar Pro 4 by Upstage · Aug 6, 2026 | 32.7 | 32 | 70 tok/s | 524K | $0.30/$1.20 | |
#72 DBRX Instruct by Databricks · Mar 27, 2024 | 1.0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#73 GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) by Z AI · Jul 28, 2025 | 13.3 | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#74 Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B by Alibaba · Sep 19, 2024 | 1.9 | N/A | N/A | 262K | N/A/N/A | |
#75 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Non-reasoning) by Google · Jun 17, 2025 | 1.4 | 4 | 319 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.10/$0.40 | |
#76 Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B by Nous Research · Aug 15, 2024 | 1.0 | 1 | 34 tok/s | N/A | $0.70/$0.70 | |
#77 North Mini Code by Cohere · Jun 9, 2026 | 13.5 | N/A | 56 tok/s | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#78 Sonar Reasoning Pro by Perplexity · Jan 28, 2025 | 11.8 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#79 GPT-5.5 (xhigh) by OpenAI · Apr 23, 2026 | 45.6 | 11 | 85 tok/s | 1.1M | $5.00/$30.00 | |
#80 Medium by Mistral · Dec 11, 2023 | 1.0 | 1 | 130 tok/s | 262K | $1.50/$7.50 | |
#81 GPT-6 Astra (xhigh) by OpenAI · Sep 3, 2026 | 54.3 | 9 | 57 tok/s | 1.1M | $10.00/$50.00 | |
#82 Nova 2.0 Omni (Non-reasoning) by Amazon · Nov 26, 2025 | 4.8 | 5 | N/A | N/A | $0.30/$2.50 | |
#83 Granite 4.0 Micro by IBM · Sep 22, 2025 | 1.0 | N/A | N/A | 131K | N/A/N/A | |
#84 Claude 3 Haiku by Anthropic · Mar 4, 2024 | 1.0 | 1 | N/A | 1.0M | $0.25/$1.25 | |
#85 Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort) by Anthropic · Jul 24, 2026 | 43.8 | 10 | 54 tok/s | 1.0M | $5.00/$25.00 | |
#86 Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba · Mar 2, 2026 | 14.1 | 27 | 86 tok/s | 262K | $0.17/$0.25 | |
#87 7B Instruct by Mistral · Sep 27, 2023 | 1.0 | 2 | 108 tok/s | 262K | $0.25/$0.25 | |
#88 Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning) by Google · May 20, 2025 | 13.9 | 18 | 223 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.30/$2.50 | |
#89 GPT-6 Astra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI · Sep 3, 2026 | 47.8 | 10 | N/A | 1.1M | $10.00/$50.00 | |
#90 Gemma 3 4B Instruct by Google · Mar 12, 2025 | 1.0 | N/A | N/A | 262K | N/A/N/A | |
#91 Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba · Feb 24, 2026 | 24.8 | 28 | 133 tok/s | 262K | $0.40/$3.20 | |
#92 MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi · Apr 22, 2026 | 29.5 | 51 | 52 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.14/$0.28 | |
#93 Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) by SpaceXAI · Nov 19, 2025 | 23.9 | N/A | N/A | 500K | N/A/N/A | |
#94 Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Non-reasoning) by Nous Research · Aug 27, 2025 | 1.3 | 2 | 84 tok/s | N/A | $0.13/$0.40 | |
#95 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) by NVIDIA · Dec 15, 2025 | 1.8 | 7 | 157 tok/s | N/A | $0.05/$0.20 | |
#96 Claude Sonnet 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) by Anthropic · Jun 30, 2026 | 45.1 | 16 | 75 tok/s | 1.0M | $2.00/$10.00 | |
#97 Grok 3 by SpaceXAI · Feb 19, 2025 | 12.3 | 4 | N/A | 500K | $4.00/$20.00 | |
#98 GLM 5V Turbo (Reasoning) by Z AI · Apr 1, 2026 | 27.6 | N/A | N/A | 203K | N/A/N/A | |
#99 Small 3.1 by Mistral · Mar 17, 2025 | 8.6 | 27 | 151 tok/s | 262K | $0.10/$0.30 | |
#100 Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) by Anthropic · Nov 24, 2025 | 33.6 | 8 | 53 tok/s | 1.0M | $5.00/$25.00 | |
Showing 100 of 642 models
Understanding the AI Model Leaderboard
This comprehensive AI model leaderboard helps you compare and choose the best large language models (LLMs) for your needs. We track standardized AI benchmarks, token pricing, inference speed, and model capabilities across all major AI providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, and DeepSeek.
Core AI Benchmarks Explained
Key Metrics to Consider
How to Choose the Right AI Model for Your Use Case
For Research & Analysis
Prioritize models with high MMLU-Pro (70%+) and GPQA (60%+) scores for complex reasoning tasks, academic research, and technical documentation
For Cost Optimization
Sort by input/output pricing - smaller models often deliver 80% of flagship performance at 10% of the cost for simple tasks
For Math & STEM
Filter by Math Index or AIME 2025 scores (50%+) for quantitative analysis, engineering calculations, and scientific applications
All benchmark scores and pricing data are updated daily from Artificial Analysis to reflect the latest model versions and capabilities. Use the sort filters above to find AI models by intelligence, cost, coding ability, math performance, speed, or release date.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is MMLU-Pro and why is it the standard AI intelligence benchmark?
MMLU-Pro (Massive Multitask Language Understanding - Professional) is the most comprehensive AI benchmark, testing models across 14 academic subjects including mathematics, science, history, law, and ethics. Scores range from 46% (basic competency) to 87% (near-expert level). Models scoring above 75% demonstrate strong general intelligence suitable for professional applications, while scores below 60% indicate limitations in complex reasoning tasks.
What does GPQA measure and which models score highest?
GPQA (Graduate-level Google-Proof Q&A) tests PhD-level reasoning with questions designed to be "Google-proof" - requiring deep understanding rather than simple fact retrieval. Top models like GPT-5.1 (87.3%), GPT-5 mini (82.8%), and o3 (82.7%) excel at GPQA, making them ideal for research, technical analysis, and complex problem-solving. Models below 50% GPQA struggle with advanced reasoning and may provide superficial answers to complex questions.
What is AIME 2025 and how does it evaluate AI mathematical ability?
AIME 2025 (American Invitational Mathematics Examination) is an elite math competition benchmark that tests advanced problem-solving, algebra, geometry, and number theory. Scores above 80% (like GPT-5 Codex at 98.7% or GPT-5.1 at 94%) indicate exceptional mathematical reasoning suitable for engineering, scientific computing, and quantitative analysis. Models scoring below 50% may struggle with multi-step mathematical problems or require explicit problem breakdown.
How is AI model pricing calculated and what's considered cost-effective?
AI model pricing is measured per 1 million tokens (approximately 750,000 words). Input pricing covers text you send, while output pricing covers generated responses. Budget models like Llama 3.3 70B cost $0.54/$0.71 per million tokens, mid-tier models like GPT-5 nano cost $0.05/$0.40, while premium models like GPT-5 cost $1.25/$10. For typical applications with 3:1 input-to-output ratio, budget models can be 10-20x cheaper than flagship models while maintaining 70-80% performance.
Which AI models are best for coding and programming tasks?
Sort by Coding Index to see top programming models. Our Coding Index combines LiveCodeBench, SciCode, and coding benchmarks. Top performers include GPT-5.1 (57.5 index), GPT-5 mini (51.4), and GPT-5 Codex (53.5). These models excel at code generation, debugging, refactoring, and explaining complex algorithms. For budget-conscious developers, models with 40+ coding index scores offer excellent value for routine programming tasks.
How often are AI model benchmarks and rankings updated?
Our leaderboard syncs daily with Artificial Analysis API to ensure benchmark scores (MMLU-Pro, GPQA, AIME 2025), pricing, and inference speed data reflect the latest model versions. New model releases appear immediately under the "Newest" sort option. Benchmark scores can change when providers release updated versions - for example, GPT-5.1 released in November 2025 achieved 69.7 intelligence compared to GPT-5's 68.5 from August 2025.
What inference speed (tokens/second) do I need for my application?
Inference speed determines how fast models generate responses. For real-time chatbots and interactive applications, target 100+ tokens/second (models like gpt-oss-120B at 340 tok/s). For background processing and batch jobs, 50-100 tok/s is sufficient. Premium reasoning models like GPT-5 (103 tok/s) balance speed and capability. Note that higher inference speed doesn't always mean better quality - slower models often deliver more thoughtful, detailed responses.
Can I test these AI models for free before committing?
Yes! Try our free AI chat interface to test different models instantly without creating an account. Many providers also offer free tiers: OpenAI (ChatGPT with daily limits), Anthropic (Claude with usage caps), Google (Gemini free tier), and open-source models like Llama 3.3. Compare performance on your specific use case before upgrading to paid plans.